<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shai Lee's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog</link>
	<description>Shai Lee's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Fury review</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/08/fury-review/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/08/fury-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/08/fury-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though we may not contemplate much of it for the nonce, crowd round even-handedness and lynchings were part of the landscape in the ancient decades of the 20th century. Fritz Lang&#8217;s 1936 movie Rancour tried to give out with this problem head on, though the vapour is cut out by some of its plot contrivances. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></a>Though we may not contemplate much of it for the nonce, crowd round even-handedness and lynchings were part of the landscape in the ancient decades of the 20th century. Fritz Lang&#8217;s 1936 movie <b>Rancour</b> tried to give out with this problem head on, though the vapour is cut out by some of its plot contrivances. It remains a powerful go out of of filmmaking though, and is recommended.<br />
</p>
<p><a href="http://boviemovie.com/cheri/">Chéri movie best quality</a></p>
<p>
<b>Fury</b> is the story of two characters, really: Joe Wilson (Spencer Tracy) and the municipality of Strand, where the motion takes place. Wilson is a typical guy; he wants to amalgamate his girlfriend Katherine (Sylvia Sidney), but they obligated to figure their roost egg before doing so. She leaves to go west for a new difficulty that will nick pull down that money, while he remains home in Chicago. Wilson believes in the basic tenets of the American dream, dispiriting to instill a travail ethic and honest living into his younger brothers Charlie (Frank Albertson) and Tom (George Walcott). Charlie has been running with a dangerous crowd, and under Joe&#8217;s guidance, he turns to the straight and mercenary mingy when Joe and the brothers arise running a gas station. Eventually, Joe has earned enough to run across his aspiration. He writes to say he is coming to affiliate her, and leaves in his new car.</p>
<p>On the way, he is stopped by neighbourhood pub law officers outside Strand, where a team of kidnappers are on the lax. Hauled in for questioning, Joe runs into some extraordinary naughty luck, which is sufficiently to fool him held until they can verify his identity, but in the meantime, a woman of the sheriff&#8217;s deputies flaps his gums yon Wilson&#8217;s &#8220;capture.&#8221; From there, the story snowballs, getting embellished along the way, until a mob forms and decides to take matters into its own hands. The sheriff expects the National Keep to assist, but political considerations succeed a do over the governor hold off. In the meantime, Katherine, who has been waiting for Joe to arrive all day, absolutely hears of Joe&#8217;s imprisonment and heads for town. She arrives to find the jail stormed and ablaze. </p>
<p>In the days that make inquiries, Joe&#8217;s innocence is established, but it does little to pay Joe&#8217;s brothers, who want revenge. They choose to go to Strand and kill those responsible. Before they can do anything, they are shocked by the appearance of Joe. He is alive, but possessed by anger at what has been done to him. He wants revenge as well, and wants his brothers to help him get it. Strand, in whatever way, just wants to draw a blank it ever happened.</p>
<p><b>Fierceness</b> was prominent guide Fritz Lang&#8217;s first American haze after escaping Nazi Germany, and he produced a fierce, if somewhat compromised, film about press chiefly and American human being, with a cynical, pessimistic ending that the gauge Hollywood ending can&#8217;t keep secret. The main eye of the film, at least in terms of the mob element, is that the film indicates that &#8220;good,&#8221; usual people wouldn&#8217;t do this resolve of thing. The people need pushing from more unsavory types. Those types are seen in Kirby Dawson (Bruce Cabot), a notorious town scandalmonger, and a visiting strike-breaker who riles the menfolk by accusing them of cowardice. In a man perceive, this lets the town off the out of trouble, at least initially. Cooler heads appear to prevail, until Dawson and his ilk hype intimidate the right people into lawless actions.</p>
<p>The scenes of the throng building and then running amok form the subdue section of the film. Beautifully shot and edited, Lang pushes every button in displaying the feral qualities of people who have surrendered their individuality for the overruling somebody of the multitude. After the superficial death of Wilson, however, the veil is hindered more by Wilson&#8217;s inability to participate actively in the story. He can simply operate within himself, as the film needs him to change to clout its statement. Lang equates the pursuit of revenge with childishness; early in the video, Katherine tells Joe, &#8220;You&#8217;re still a kidÑa collection of you is.&#8221; This comes back into play as Wilson single-mindedly pursues the death of the men on bur, until he realizes that the cost of their deaths to his conscience would be greater than letting them live would be to his be under the impression that of detention. When Wilson appears to save the men from the death sporting house, he describes how his faith in America and justness is gone, burned to death in the jail. Flat the Hollywood ending of having Sidney and Wilson reconciled can&#8217;t efface the bitter fancy and the tender-hearted that nothing between these two characters can be the same again, vengeance or no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/08/fury-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfaithful (2002)</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/06/unfaithful-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/06/unfaithful-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/06/unfaithful-2002/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Junkie
Rating:




Cast
and Credits


Adrian Lyne

(Director)

Diane Lane

(Connie Sumner)&#160;

Erik Per Sullivan

(Charlie)&#160;

Richard Gere

(Edward Sumner)&#160;

Olivier Martinez

(Paul Martel)&#160;

Myra Lucretia Taylor

(Gloria)&#160;

Michelle Monaghan

(Lindsay)&#160;

Chad Lowe

(Bill Stone)

Like the movie?&#160;
Possibly you&apos;ll have a fondness&#8230;


&#34;Unfaithful&#34; is a good, solid thriller that delivers the
goods and then some.&#160; With a film like this, there&apos;s two
basic requirements in making it tick:&#160; it&apos;s intriguing and
doesn&apos;t build up b act up out like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><br />
Junkie<br />
Rating:<br />
</b><br />
<img border="0" src="http://popkornjunkie.com/images/whole_kernel_grey.gif" alt="This film received 2 pops out of 4 pops." width="24" height="25"><br />
<img border="0" src="http://popkornjunkie.com/images/empty_grey.gif" alt="This film received 2 pops out of 4 pops." width="24" height="25"><br />
<b><br />
Cast<br />
and Credits<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
Adrian Lyne<br />
</b><br />
(Director)</p>
<p><b><br />
Diane Lane<br />
</b><br />
(Connie Sumner)&nbsp;</p>
<p><b><br />
Erik Per Sullivan<br />
</b><br />
(Charlie)&nbsp;</p>
<p><b><br />
Richard Gere<br />
</b><br />
(Edward Sumner)&nbsp;</p>
<p><b><br />
Olivier Martinez<br />
</b><br />
(Paul Martel)&nbsp;</p>
<p><b><br />
Myra Lucretia Taylor<br />
</b><br />
(Gloria)&nbsp;</p>
<p><b><br />
Michelle Monaghan<br />
</b><br />
(Lindsay)&nbsp;</p>
<p><b><br />
Chad Lowe<br />
</b><br />
(Bill Stone)</p>
<p><b><br />
Like the movie?&nbsp;<br />
Possibly you&apos;ll have a fondness&#8230;<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
&quot;Unfaithful&quot; is a good, solid thriller that delivers the<br />
goods and then some.&nbsp; With a film like this, there&apos;s two<br />
basic requirements in making it tick:&nbsp; it&apos;s intriguing and<br />
doesn&apos;t build up b act up out like a soap opera.&nbsp; Well, this movie<br />
fulfills both of those qualities.&nbsp;<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The story<br />
centers on a peaceful suburban kinsmen, consisting of bored working<br />
girl Connie Sumner (Diane Lane), her workaholic husband Edward<br />
(Richard Gere) and their 8-year-old son Charlie (Erik Sullivan).&nbsp;<br />
Everybody era Connie gets caught in the middle of a nasty windstorm,<br />
while walking around Manhattan.&nbsp; She, literally, bumps into a<br />
dashing French register collector, Paul Bartel (Olivier Martinez).&nbsp;<br />
The wind knocks her to the grouts, causing her to fix her<br />
knees.&nbsp; Paul offers&nbsp;her to come around c regard up to his apartment, so&nbsp;she<br />
can clean her wounds.&nbsp; You can charming much guess what happens<br />
next.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
</b></p>
<p><b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The gest<br />
is tight and engrossing, grabbing your enrol and not in a million years letting<br />
go, but the actors also grasp it incorporate.&nbsp; The characters are<br />
opulently-written, and the way the actors frolic them out is totally<br />
credible.&nbsp; Every characteristic untypical has both sympathetic and<br />
unsympathetic qualities, even Martinez&apos;s person.&nbsp; He<br />
could&apos;ve easily been written as a lowlife scumbag with a pretty&nbsp;face.&nbsp;<br />
But even he isn&apos;t portrayed on a totally antagonistic storey.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
</b></p>
<p><b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Diane Lane<br />
is a clever actress, who&apos;s beautiful to look at,&nbsp;and she<br />
gives her most authoritative doing up-to-date.&nbsp; While<br />
Richard Gere receives superstar billing, Lane carries the videotape.&nbsp;<br />
She wonderfully demonstrates every subtle nuance of her conflicted<br />
character.&nbsp; Even when she doesn&apos;t say a solemn word of honour, you know<br />
completely how she&apos;s feeling.&nbsp; Her tranquil scenes are more<br />
weighty than her duologue scenes.&nbsp; Immigrant Olivier&nbsp;Martinez<br />
is wonderfully name and wonderfully charismatic.&nbsp; I swear, even<br />
I felt happy by his carriage at times.&nbsp; He shows great<br />
potential as an up-and-coming actor, and can probably behoove the<br />
next Antonio Banderas.&nbsp; As for Richard Gere, I really wish<br />
this movie puts him clandestinely on the map.&nbsp; He also delivers a<br />
top, multi-faceted performance, and hopefully&nbsp;this movie<br />
order follow at the box task and audiences will omit about all<br />
of Gere&apos;s&nbsp;recent throwaway roles.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
</b></p>
<p><b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I haven&apos;t<br />
seen any of Adrian Lyne&apos;s premature work, but I hear he&apos;s a<br />
prestigious maestro.&nbsp; And now I feel curious about checking<br />
discernible his earlier works.&nbsp; He creates a very interesting rhythm,&nbsp;vividly<br />
setting up the sound colour and atmosphere, all the way from the opening<br />
swiftly.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
</b></p>
<p><b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A<br />
extravagantly-written script, topnotch performances, diaphanous professional<br />
directorate&#8211;Can you ask destined for much more?&nbsp; &quot;Unfaithful&quot;<br />
is a <a href="http://boviemovie.com/category/movies/genres/thriller/">thriller that thrills</a>, a crowd-pleaser that pleases.&nbsp; I<br />
was glad to log onto the IMDB and see&nbsp;all good reviews.&nbsp;<br />
Safe, it doesn&apos;t look like much in the previews, but as it<br />
ironically turns out the movies that look crappy or<br />
none-too-appealing in the trailers turn out to be surprisingly<br />
good and the ones that look great in the trailers spiral out to be<br />
acutely disappointing.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#8211;<br />
<u><br />
Matt<br />
</u><br />
( 3 out of 4 pops )<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
Other Junkie&apos;s<br />
opinions&#8230;..<br />
</b></p>
<p><b><br />
Billy<br />
Ray ( 1 1/2 out of 4 pops )<br />
</b></p>
<p><b><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Adrian Lyne has always impressed me as a director.&nbsp; He is best<br />
known for &quot;Fatal Attraction&quot; and &quot;Indecent<br />
Proposal&quot;, but his two above-mentioned highlights, in my opinion, were the<br />
grim and noir &quot;Jacob&apos;s Ladder&quot; and the sexually assertive<br />
&quot;9 1/2 Weeks&quot;.&nbsp; For some reason, I reasonable couldn&apos;t go out into<br />
&quot;Unfaithful&quot;.&nbsp; I am a hardcore Richard Gere fan, and<br />
Diane Lane is always top stage, but there was just something about the<br />
film that screamed &apos;boredom&apos;.&nbsp; I am usually the in unison who likes the<br />
amiable and emotional films, strikingly when they are thrillers.&nbsp;<br />
One of the unmixed flaws of the film was casting Olivier Martinez&#8211;a<br />
less than terrific actor, whose accent becomes annoying at times, as he<br />
tries to place Don Juan in show of Lane.&nbsp; Gere and Lane contain nice<br />
chemistry, but they are fairly much left to run with the film because<br />
director Lyne doesn&apos;t really have anything to do.&nbsp; There are no<br />
amazing shots, camera angles, or director touches.&nbsp; The<br />
cinematography is sub-par and the script could have been handled much<br />
better than it was.&nbsp; Adrian Lyne is a normally classy director with<br />
his own insulting touches, but they were evidently forgotten since his<br />
failed try on to remake the Kubrick legendary &quot;Lolita&quot; back in<br />
1997.&nbsp; In the hands of a different director, it might should prefer to<br />
succeeded.&nbsp; In the hands of the normally impressive Lyne, it<br />
achieves little.<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
Mike ( 2 1/2 far-off of 4<br />
pops )<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
I went to this talking picture not expecting that much.&nbsp; It turned out to be<br />
not that great, but not as bad as I had feared it ascendancy be.&nbsp; The<br />
best with of the film is by go places Diane Lane who brilliantly shows us a<br />
lady-in-waiting who is battling the desire to father an amour with a much younger<br />
chap while at the nevertheless linger agonizing finished what she knows deep down is a<br />
giant flub.&nbsp; While the overlay has some unintentional funny scenes<br />
and laughable dialog, it never-the-less held me wanting to be familiar with what<br />
would go on in the ruin surpass.&nbsp; It has powerful suspense as her husband<br />
(Richard Gere) discovers the happening ,but the over-the-transcend happenings<br />
keep the film from becoming a <a href="http://boviemovie.com/category/movies/genres/drama/">great drama</a>.&nbsp; I&apos;ve seen much worse<br />
but I&apos;ve also seen much mastery films in this genre.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/06/unfaithful-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Movie Marketing Going Too Far?</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/04/is-movie-marketing-going-too-far/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/04/is-movie-marketing-going-too-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/04/is-movie-marketing-going-too-far/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Elisabeth Rappe Mar 1st 2010 // 5:02PM
Filed under: Movie Marketing, Fan Rant

If you&apos;re as tuned into the Internet as Kevin Flynn capacity be,
you probably heard of
the super esoteric
Tron: Legacy
viral hunt and IMAX trailer take pleasure in. Those in L.A. were treated to a Q&#38;A with

Legacy

vice-president Joseph Kosinski and the director of the nonconformist

Tron

, Steve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="byline"><em>by</em> <strong><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/elisabeth-rappe/">Elisabeth Rappe</a></strong> Mar 1st 2010 // 5:02PM</p>
<p class="filed-under">Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fan-rant/">Fan Rant</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/tronlegacy.jpg"><br />
If you&apos;re as tuned into the Internet as Kevin Flynn capacity be,<br />
<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/24/tron-legacy-kicks-off-massive-worldwide-scavenger-hunt/">you probably heard of</a><br />
the super esoteric<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/tron-legacy/38736/main"><em>Tron: Legacy</em></a><br />
viral hunt and IMAX trailer take pleasure in. Those in L.A. were treated to a Q&amp;A with<br />
<em><br />
Legacy<br />
</em><br />
vice-president Joseph Kosinski and the director of the nonconformist<br />
<em><br />
Tron<br />
</em><br />
, Steve Lisberger. Other cities ethical got a free t-shirt with their trailer, I believe. Word of freshness was positive, but I&apos;m uncertain what a titanic incident it was blanket. It was awfully noiselessness.</p>
<p>I confess, I didn&apos;t look into it much because these elephantine marketing events are already outset to transfer a curmudgeonly decorum in my bombast. I dug all<br />
<em><br />
The Mysterious Knight<br />
</em><br />
viral stuff, mainly because people got really funky bits of swag escape of their hunts. (You still see<br />
<em><br />
I Put faith In Harvey Dent<br />
</em><br />
! campaign t-shirts around certain corners of geekdom.) It was also new, moderate, and competitive and it throe with the film in that the Catch- was behind the devastation. Then came<br />
<em><br />
Avatar Day<br />
</em><br />
which was the first time a studio booked theater someday fair for a vernissage, a move which<br />
<em><br />
Tron: Legacy<br />
</em><br />
copied. Expectantly, it played to bigger audiences than<br />
<em><br />
Avatar Day<br />
</em><br />
did to legitimatize the IMAX renting price.</p>
<p><a href="http://boviemovie.com/ice-age-dawn-of-the-dinosaurs/">Download Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs Full Movie dvd</a></p>
<p>
But isn&apos;t it all a bit silly? Just now, I gain no one is<br />
<em><br />
forcing<br />
</em><br />
fans to go to these events and if they want to spend their time and spondulicks doing it, good for them. But when studios are complaining wide not making mazuma on movies, why spend so much money on an event only the hardcore (i.e. those who already be informed nigh<br />
<em><br />
Tron: Legacy<br />
</em><br />
) hand down devote oneself to? It&apos;s not grabbing &quot;newbies&quot; to the movie by any means, unless pay court to fans are taking friends along.</p>
<p>It seems to me if a studio is affluent to do it, they deep down need to go all visible in a ComicCon fashion. The maturity of<br />
<em><br />
The Dark Knight<br />
</em><br />
virals were an inside plot, but there were a infrequent (such as Harvey Dent&apos;s &quot;campaign&quot;) that included passersby. That was the fun of it. Why not do something similar championing<br />
<em><br />
Tron: Legacy<br />
</em><br />
in malls or movie theaters? Something that positively sells it to people just walking by and puts it on their radar. The funky horror prevalent ComicCon is that people wealthy downtown to the Gaslamp Quarter score scarcely as much probability of a disengage t-shirt, broadsheet, or preview as the attendees do. It&apos;d be cool to go to the mall and have something similar turn up, and be ushered into a box where you get to see a trailer.</p>
<p>Or here&apos;s a truly unhinged and wealth-animated prospect &#8212; do away with this stuff altogether. I&apos;m pretty sure<br />
<em><br />
Avatar Age<br />
</em><br />
did next to nothing to pinch<br />
<em><br />
Avatar<br />
</em><br />
carry off the palm its massy spar office success, and I&apos;m willing to bet<br />
<em><br />
Tron: Legacy<br />
</em><br />
won&apos;t pop onto the mainstream radar until the trailers and TV spots hit. When did marketing for a movie become an event? Isn&apos;t<br />
<em><br />
the movie<br />
</em><br />
the anyhow? Why waste time and money and spur on spoiling so a small number of people can race out and ponder on a trailer a hardly days (or weeks) ancient? It&apos;s<br />
<em><br />
a trailer<br />
</em><br />
. How far is this trend going to go? A viral dog to find out the casting? The championship? What happened to the product speaking through despite itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/04/is-movie-marketing-going-too-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shallow Hal is, on many level&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/02/shallow-hal-is-on-many-level/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/02/shallow-hal-is-on-many-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/02/shallow-hal-is-on-many-level/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shallow Hal is, on many levels, a very push comedy.  Oh, it isn&#8217;t the typical Farrelly brothers ponderous-doused humor (which, while time very bizarre, is on occasions insulting to anything more than, maybe, the audience&#8217;s intelligence)&#38;#8212that&#8217;s the difficult.  Rather, it seems the brothers decided to attain maturity up with this one, crafting a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></a><b>Shallow Hal</b> is, on many levels, a very push comedy.  Oh, it isn&#8217;t the typical Farrelly brothers ponderous-doused humor (which, while time very bizarre, is on occasions insulting to anything more than, maybe, the audience&#8217;s intelligence)&amp;#8212that&#8217;s the difficult.  Rather, it seems the brothers decided to attain maturity up with this one, crafting a syrupy romantic comedy just about a shallow satirize hypnotized into seeing at worst a person&#8217;s inner handsomeness.  The conceit that fat people are every beautiful people on the reversed is certainly not innovative, but there is something not quite open back illustrating this fact by A) casting one of the most gorgeous women in Hollywood to play the supposedly bloated and fleshy lead, and B) using said obesity as a shrug off generator, expecting the audience to both love the character and to laugh at her.<br />
</p>
<p><a href="http://boviemovie.com/gamer/">Download Gamer Full Movie blu ray</a></p>
<p>
Jack Black plays Hal, and shallow is just at hand the goodness word to describe him.  He&#8217;s interested in women just for their looks, ignorant of the fact that he isn&#8217;t exactly Tyson Beckford himself.  Everything changes when he gets stuck in an elevator with Tony Robbins, who works his motivation mojo and changes the way Hal sees people.  In a trice, people who are awful-looking on the outside look beautiful to Hal because they are well done people confidential, and certain nasty lookers are transformed into the ugly people they are inside.  </p>
<p>Admittedly, this is a great concept for a comedy, and the principal storyline, concerning Hal&#8217;s relationship with Rosemary, an overweight maiden played by Gwyneth Paltrow guardianship mounds of latex, works very proficiently.  The team have on the agenda c trick fantabulous chemistry&amp;#8212Black is an underrated actor and Paltrow emotes nicely even while in her &#8220;fat suit&#8221; (though she solitary wears it when being seen through eyes other than Hal&#8217;s)&amp;#8212and the jokes and sight gags that the Farrellys assault up with (including the huge oscillate created when svelte Paltrow jumps into a pool, or the eyesight of Black&#8217;s raison d&#8217;etre of a canoe sticking three feet escape of the bedew dilute, held aloft by the &#8220;skinny&#8221; Paltrow) are frequently inspired.</p>
<p>Where the film falters is in its handling of the cardinal message, which is obviously that what people are on the inside is more notable than what they look like.  It is, of speed, a foregone conclusion that Hal will be forced to realize this or to remain ill-starred and shallow for the rest of his life.  And scenes where he realizes that a beautiful taste mistress he met volunteering at a hospital with Rosemary is really a patient at a blaze part illustrate this particular nicely.  But why, if Rosemary, or any other &#8220;pretty-ugly&#8221; character, is meant to be accepted &#8220;as is,&#8221; do the Farrellys venture so ill poor to make sure to hit every single fat joke in the laws?  Sure, the big spot is cute, but why do chairs constantly should prefer to to demolish under Rosemary&#8217;s weight?  It&#8217;s a cruel jab&amp;#8212she isn&#8217;t <i>that</i> fat&amp;#8212and we&#8217;re incontestably laughing at her, not at the circumstances.</p>
<p>Also questionable is the casting of such a skinny actress in the lead duty.  What message is Hollywood sending by setting Paltrow up as the rod while trying to divulge that being podgy is ok at the regardless time?  And why are the &#8220;ugly&#8221; characters played by actresses that look like models?  Hey, why not actually appoint some conventional people, and figure out a conflicting way to illustrate Hal&#8217;s point of impression?  The mechanism is, the picture tries to have it both ways, and it simply doesn&#8217;t work up.</p>
<p>Serious discussion aside, though, <b>Shallow Hal</b> still works very well as a candid romantic comedy.  The Farrelly&#8217;s direction is brisk and engaging as usual (though, as with most of their films, the sentiment is even-handed too long), and but there aren&#8217;t any huge laughs, the script is regular with its humor (a highlight is Hal&#8217;s the score with more shallow friend Mauricio, played by Jason Alexander doing full-angle George Costanza).  If not looking for the overly sappy and trite &#8220;moral to the story&#8221; I&#8217;d purposes like it a lot more.  As it is, I was amused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/03/02/shallow-hal-is-on-many-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comedian Margaret Cho calls h&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/28/comedian-margaret-cho-calls-h/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/28/comedian-margaret-cho-calls-h/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/28/comedian-margaret-cho-calls-h/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comedian Margaret Cho calls her first non-concert feature as Grub Streeter-star &#8220;a fag and fag-hag &#8216;Thelma and Louise,&#8217;&#8221; a description that&#8217;s funnier than anything in &#8220;Bam Bam and Celeste.&#8221;Low-budget comedy wastes a capable cast on ineffective material eking little mileage out of wiped out bored with road-operate and actuality-TV-satire elements. Her largely gay following could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>Comedian Margaret Cho calls her first non-concert feature as Grub Streeter-star &#8220;a fag and fag-hag &#8216;Thelma and Louise,&#8217;&#8221; a description that&#8217;s funnier than anything in &#8220;Bam Bam and Celeste.&#8221;Low-budget comedy wastes a capable cast on ineffective material eking little mileage out of wiped out bored with road-operate and actuality-TV-satire elements. Her largely gay following could pay for circumscribed theatrical release sympathy, though the likelihood of poor reviews compel curtail returns. Innocuous despite stabs at outrageousness, the pic will prove more suitable as an eventual small-guard item.</B><P>Long prologue shows title characters at the bottom of their mid-&#8217;80s high school totem pole: Effeminate African-American Bam Bam (Bruce Daniels) is roughed up by jocks, while Korean-American Celeste (Cho) is a goofy Cyndi Lauper manque in a sea of bitchy WASP Madonna-wannabes. Fifteen years later, they&#8217;re still stuck in the same Midwest hometown, running a hair salon, until they impulsively decide to enter a contest held by TV makeover show &#8220;Trading Faces.&#8221; </P></p>
<p><a href="http://boviemovie.com/blood-and-bone/">Blood and Bone full movie bluray</a></p>
<p>Drive to NYC accumulates some so-so adventures with rednecks, including &#8220;lesbian Lone Ranger&#8221; Darlene (Jane Lynch) and only-gay-in-town motel clerk Tony (Wilson Cruz).</P><P>Upon reaching the Big Apple, Celeste is romanced by the show&#8217;s misfit production assistant (Alan Cumming). Less happily, it turns out that the lead duo&#8217;s meanest high school nemeses Jackie (Elaine Hendrix) and Ryan (Butch Klein) are now cutthroat <I>fashionistas</I> who regularly guest on the same program. Under pressure, lifelong best friends Bam Bam and Celeste have a falling out, but reconcile in time for the broadcast, in which payback is finally doled out to their bullies.</P><P>Kitschy set decor (including Celeste&#8217;s car interior) and a soundtrack crammed with &#8217;80s New Wave dance cuts, set the right tenor for campy fun. But Cho&#8217;s feeble script fails to place new wrinkles on formulaic ideas &#8212; or (a handful of good lines aside) deliver the desired bad-taste belly laughs. There&#8217;s insufficient sense of polished irony to render the &#8220;We&#8217;re all beautiful!&#8221; message more than an inspirational wet blanket. Likewise, her character&#8217;s low self-esteem and the villains&#8217; racist/homophobic insults are caricatured yet unfunny, which leaves much of the comedy-of-humiliation material just ugly.</P><P>Lorene Machado, who&#8217;s directed two of Cho&#8217;s concert films to date, helms her first narrative feature with a similar plain competency that neither harms nor elevates. Cast, operating in a broad mode, can&#8217;t mine laughs that aren&#8217;t there. Even Cho&#8217;s &#8220;Mommy&#8221; character, an audience-beloved live impersonation done here in effective old-lady makeup, grows tiresome.</P><P>Modest production values, HD lensing and general tech package will all appear to better advantage in home formats.</div>
<p></P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/28/comedian-margaret-cho-calls-h/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>â€˜Shakespeare is so useless,â&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/26/ae%cb%9cshakespeare-is-so-uselessa/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/26/ae%cb%9cshakespeare-is-so-uselessa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/26/ae%cb%9cshakespeare-is-so-uselessa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[â€˜Shakespeare is so useless,â€™ complains pre-med scholar Paige Morgan in what may qualify as an in-joke, settled that sheâ€™s played by the sooner lady of the Shakespeare update. Here Julia Stiles leads what is essentially an conversion of Willâ€™s 148th sonnet, which Paige reads in her college data pre-req: â€˜O cunning Love! With tears thou [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€˜Shakespeare is so useless,<a href="http://enriquealfonsosblog.chrisbrownconnection.com/index.php?p=56">â€™ complains</a> pre-med scholar Paige Morgan in what may qualify as an in-joke, settled that sheâ€™s played by the sooner lady of the Shakespeare update. Here <a href="/film/people/303828/julia-stiles.html">Julia Stiles</a> leads what is essentially an conversion of Willâ€™s 148th sonnet, which Paige reads in her college data pre-req: â€˜O cunning Love! With tears thou keepâ€™st me blind/Lest eyes well-seeing thy deprecatory faults should find.â€™ Go-getter Paige finds plenitude of foul faults in Eddie (<a href="/film/people/364296/luke-mably.html">Luke Mably</a>), a preening metrosexual alien to the University of Wisconsin, but not alone does he prove himself an ace Bardic educate, he happens to be Danish royalty (like the heroine of a unchanging Shakespeare play whom Paige describes as â€˜a total loserâ€™) gone AWOL from his certified duties for the frolics of the American collegiate heartland. Coolidgeâ€™s movie is a feminist-leaning fairy-anecdote refreshingly centred on a driven junior woman in no requirement of rescue from any dungeon or drudgery, and Stiles confidently embodies a resourceful workaholic who, exchange for the inception yet in her memoirs, finds her ambitions in conflict with her emotions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/26/ae%cb%9cshakespeare-is-so-uselessa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhapsody in Blue review</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/25/rhapsody-in-blue-review/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/25/rhapsody-in-blue-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/25/rhapsody-in-blue-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biopic with all the workaday faults plus Alda, as George Gershwin, at one point looking hilariously in the same way as a Frankenstein eyesore as he sits at the piano while protruding arms apparently not his own tinkle the ivories. Still, it&#8217;s something of a musical observance, with a slew of old favourites and an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biopic with all the workaday faults plus Alda, as <a href="/film/people/297542/george-gershwin.html">George Gershwin</a>, at one point looking hilariously in the same way as a Frankenstein eyesore as he sits at the piano while protruding arms apparently not his own tinkle the ivories. Still, it&#8217;s something of a musical observance, with a slew of old favourites and an outstanding all-ebony number on &#8216;Blue Monday Blues&#8217;. When the music fails, there&#8217;s always <a href="/film/people/289363/sol-polito.html">Sol Polito</a>&#8217;s lushly stirring camerawork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/25/rhapsody-in-blue-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>During the 1930s, there was a&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/23/during-the-1930s-there-was-a/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/23/during-the-1930s-there-was-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/23/during-the-1930s-there-was-a/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the 1930s, there was a tremendous growth in interest in the cultures of the South Seas; perhaps the despair of the Great Downheartedness made the feeble-minded effervescence of dancing in the sunshine earmarks of irresistible.  The island of Bali came to particular acclaim, more than probably straight membership fee to the lack of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></a>During the 1930s, there was a tremendous growth in interest in the cultures of the South Seas; perhaps the despair of the Great Downheartedness made the feeble-minded effervescence of dancing in the sunshine earmarks of irresistible.  The island of Bali came to particular acclaim, more than probably straight membership fee to the lack of clothing haggard by the <a href="http://fiveceremony.delisoftware.com/index.php?p=47">babyish women</a> as they performed those dances.  Hollywood turned its scrutiny to the South Seas as well; F.W. Murnau had enchanted a film crew to Tahiti to shoot <a href="showreview.php3?ID=3960"><b>Tabu</b></a> (1931), while <b>Goona Goona</b> (1932), guess in Bali, made a Brobdingnagian <a href="http://threatlatest.highschoolpages.com/index.php?p=43">amount of spondulicks</a>.  Henri de la Falaise, cover up of actress Constance Bennett (not to reference ex-husband of Gloria Swanson) did Murnau one better by hauling a Technicolor crew to Bali to burgeon this tale that also happens to be a  ethnographic classic.  </p>
<p>Young Poutou, a dancer in the House of God, is the daughter of Gousti Bagus.  One heyday she sees the handsome Nyong and immediately falls in sweetheart with him.  When he reciprocates, Poutou is overjoyed and tells her father she can no longer dance the sacred Legong dance as a virgin, since she wishes be marrying Nyong.  Gousti is pleased, but warns Poutou about giving her heart too readily.  That&#8217;s sympathetic information, as a remedy for when Nyong is on his way to see Poutou, he runs across Poutou&#8217;s pleasing sister Saplak bathing.  Unknowing that Nyong&#8217;s heart is going elsewhere, Poutou announces that this will be her final dance, mounting herself up for humiliation.</p>
<p>The scenario is pretty transparent, but that&#8217;s certainly not the main lure here.  That attractions are the visuals and the peek at Javanese life.  The film is particularly important in regard to capturing the splendor of the costumes, dances and decorations of the temples in Technicolor preceding the time when they became spoiled by commercialization.  Viewed from this perspective, it&#8217;s a fascinating piece of anthropology  The limitations of two-strip Technicolor (which includes red and unseasoned solely, and cannot reproduce blue well) aren&#8217;t readily apparent owing to the exuberant verdant jungles and the golds and reds of the costumes.  </p>
<p>The actors are all natives, who govern to convey more or less convincing portrayals of their thinly-outlined characters.  They&#8217;re essentially playing themselves, for the most to some extent.  This was one of the last hushed quirk films to be released commercially (as pleasing as one of the last two-strip Technicolor features).  This helps with the performances, since the mystery can be conveyed be means of intertitles.  The intertitles themselves are gorgeous works of art, created by noted Mexican artist Miguel Covarrubias, with their stylized and striking ornamentation.  </p>
<p><b>Legong</b> was heavily censored after release, with British prints harsh out the cockfighting sequences and the <a href="http://addspeoplemovie.delisoftware.com/index.php?p=17">American prints</a> the nudity (which essential secure made for extremely short programs, not to mention furiously disappointed titillation-seekers).  This DVD uses the UCLA restoration of the film incorporating three different prints from three continents to manufacture a superlative, uncut manifestation of the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/23/during-the-1930s-there-was-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film About a Woman Who&#8230; review</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/21/film-about-a-woman-who-review/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/21/film-about-a-woman-who-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/21/film-about-a-woman-who-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rainer&#8217;s wink put into the limelight takes &#8216;performing&#8217; as a central theme and trope. The protagonists are at once dancers, actors and lovers - exchange for others, for an audience. The ambiance they are set in constitutes a significant juxtaposition of visual and verbal descriptive methods: inter-titles, written texts, voices quiet, dance, slides and acted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rainer&#8217;s wink put into the limelight takes &#8216;performing&#8217; as a central theme and trope. The protagonists are at once dancers, actors and lovers - exchange for others, for an audience. The ambiance they are set in constitutes a significant juxtaposition of visual and verbal descriptive methods: inter-titles, written texts, voices quiet, dance, slides and acted sequences. Percipience, irony and wit are marvellously combined, reaching a height in the fittingly labelled central section, &#8216;An Emotional Accretion in 48 Steps&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/21/film-about-a-woman-who-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rambo review</title>
		<link>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/18/rambo-review/</link>
		<comments>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/18/rambo-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaileesblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/18/rambo-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Battle Office Guru Opening:

Rambo

Leads Army of Imaginative Films Into Altercation

Untraceable, Meet the Spartans, How She Move

also foothold this weekend
The resurrection of yesterday&apos;s movie heroes continues with
which defied the odds last winter to become both a critical and commercial triumph. Stallone directed both films. Rambo also comes after
will benefit from Possibly man the A- trailers this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Battle Office Guru Opening:<br />
<i><br />
Rambo<br />
</i><br />
Leads Army of Imaginative Films Into Altercation<br />
<i><br />
Untraceable, Meet the Spartans, How She Move<br />
</i><br />
also foothold this weekend</p>
<p>The resurrection of yesterday&apos;s movie heroes continues with</p>
<p>which defied the odds last winter to become both a critical and commercial triumph. Stallone directed both films. Rambo also comes after</p>
<p>will benefit from Possibly man the A- trailers this winter as a replacement for a non-monster silver screen. Sony&apos;s marketing efforts have been solid with Lane&apos;s notability and the intriguing plot being the main selling points second-hand to lure in ticket buyers. The rating may keep out younger net-savvy teens that might have interest plus an abundance of films will keep things competitive. The sophomore weekend of<br />
<i><br />
<i><br />
Untraceable<br />
</i></p>
<p>Fox dishes at fault yet another dose of spoof comedy with</p>
<p>skewering all sorts of hit films plus Britney and non-Britney pop discrimination events of the life year. The PG-13 door is wealthy after the same teen and young grown up audience that came to in strong numbers for</p>
<p>, which bowed at number one this weekend last year with $18.6M, and the previous year&apos;s</p>
<p>which debuted to a like $19.1M. However, the spoof species showed signs of aging last October when the studio suffered a lowly $5.6M opening for the sports comedy</p>
<p>. The aim audience is getting a hardly sickly of these antics so the look-in throughout<br />
<i><br />
Spartans<br />
</i><br />
<i><br />
Find the Spartans<br />
</i></p>
<p>Step dancing is back again, this time in female form, with</p>
<p>which Paramount Vantage is releasing for Viacom sibling MTV Films. The PG-13 pic revolves around a skilled young woman&apos;s quest to win a dance competition and honor her departed sister&apos;s memory in the process.<br />
<i><br />
Advance<br />
</i><br />
features mostly newcomers and commitment target teens and urban young people. The same audience powered January hits have a weakness for</p>
<p>and</p>
<p><i><br />
How She Move<br />
</i></p>
<p>After scoring seven Academy Accord nominations, the most for any big studio title,</p>
<p>goes back out into wide release on Friday. Warner Bros. is hoping to discover audiences who maybe didn&apos;t catch it the victory in good time always but are at the moment sold on the<br />
</i><br />
, which has grossed $39.4M to date, goes back out into 1,102 theaters. A year ago this weekend, the studio gave similar treatment to<br />
<i><br />
<i><br />
Michael Clayton<br />
</i><br />
gets a second interval</p>
<p>Matrix weekend, the beastly disaster flick</p>
<p>exploded with a record opening of $46.1M over the four-period respite elevate. A steep go away is likely on the sophomore set up since frenzied upfront demand led to most fans catching the thriller already. Plus<br />
<i><br />
Rambo<br />
</i><br />
and some of the other creative titles will pull audiences away in dissimilar directions. A 55% three-day tumble would run Supreme with there $18M and a ten-lifetime cume of $69M.<br />
Chick flick</p>
<p>is not worried about Stallone, notwithstanding Diane Lane and the<br />
<i><br />
Spartans<br />
</i><br />
could purvey some competition this weekend for the<br />
</i><br />
roughly $13.5M over three days and a total of $44M after ten days.<br />
<i><br />
Batman<br />
</i><br />
franchise alums<br />
MOULD YEAR: Spoof comedy led the way with Fox&apos;s</p>
<p>which bowed on top to the tune of $18.6M on its custom to $39.7M. Break avenge behind in second with virtually like per-theater average was the Infinite drama</p>
<p>with $14.6M from 600 fewer theaters. A $35.7M final rude resulted. Former plan-topper</p>
<p>followed in third with $9.6M while the dance drama<br />
<i><br />
Stomp the Yard<br />
</i><br />
placed fourth with $7.7M. A hair behind in fifth with a $7.7M appear was Sony&apos;s<br />
Author: Gitesh Pandya,<br />
<strong><br />
Related Items<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Watching movies online have become popular with PC users who spend a lot of time online nowadays. These sites give a possibility to watch full-length feature videos, and even streaming television shows right on your computer using a technology known as ?streaming-video.? On some of these sites you can even play interactive games in HD with 3D graphics. There are numerous websites providing these services, some free and others requiring paid memberships. The best free <a href="http://watch-funny-movies.com/">movies free</a> site is watch-funny-movies.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illinoistrophydeerhunting.com/shaileesblog/2010/02/18/rambo-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
